← California State Legislature · All bills
SB 682
Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Senate · Environment
What this bill does
This bill would, on and after January 1, 2028, prohibit a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale a cleaning product, dental floss, juvenile product, food packaging, or ski wax, as provided, that contains intentionally added PFAS, as defined, except for previously used products and as otherwise preempted by federal law. The bill would, until January 1, 2031, exempt certain components of a cleaning product from this prohibition, as specified. …
Read the full official summary
Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control, on or before January 1, 2029, to adopt regulations to enforce specified covered perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) restrictions, which include prohibitions on the distribution, sale, or offering for sale of certain products that contain specified levels of PFAS. Existing law requires the department, on and after July 1, 2030, to enforce and ensure compliance with those provisions and regulations, as provided. Existing law requires manufacturers of these products, on or before July 1, 2029, to register with the department, to pay a registration fee to the department, and to provide a statement of compliance certifying compliance with the applicable prohibitions on the use of PFAS to the department, as specified. Existing law authorizes the department to test products and to rely on third-party testing to determine compliance with prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as specified. Existing law requires the department to issue a notice of violation for a product in violation of the prohibitions on the use of PFAS, as provided. Existing law authorizes the department to assess an administrative penalty for a violation of these prohibitions and authorizes the department to seek an injunction to restrain a person or entity from violating these prohibitions, as specified.
This bill would, on and after January 1, 2028, prohibit a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale a cleaning product, dental floss, juvenile product, food packaging, or ski wax, as provided, that contains intentionally added PFAS, as defined, except for previously used products and as otherwise preempted by federal law. The bill would, until January 1, 2031, exempt certain components of a cleaning product from this prohibition, as specified. The bill would clarify that, on and after January 1, 2028, a cleaning product is required to comply with certain regulations adopted by the California Air Resources Board regarding volatile organic compounds in consumer products, and would prohibit the use of a regulatory variance to comply with those regulations, as specified. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2030, prohibit a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale cookware that contains intentionally added PFAS, except for previously used products and as otherwise preempted by federal law. The bill would authorize the department, on or before January 1, 2029, to adopt regulations to carry out these provisions.
This bill would require these prohibitions on products containing intentionally added PFAS to be enforced by the department pursuant to the existing authority described above, including, but not limited to, product testing and administrative penalties. The bill would require a manufacturer of a product regulated by the bill to provide a certificate of compliance to the department upon request instead of on or before July 1, 2029. The bill would exempt a manufacturer of a product regulated by the bill from the registration and registration fees required by the existing enforcement authority described above.
Official summary from the Legislative Counsel’s office, via OpenStates.
Floor votes (3)
June 3, 2025 — Third reading vote
Passed · 28 yes · 7 no · 5 other
Yes (28): Ben Allen, Bob Archuleta, Jesse Arreguín, Angelique Ashby, Josh Becker, Catherine Blakespear, Christopher Cabaldon, Anna Caballero, Sabrina Cervantes, Dave Cortese, María Elena Durazo, Lena Gonzalez, Tim Grayson, Melissa Hurtado, John Laird, Monique Limón, Mike McGuire, Jerry McNerney, Caroline Menjivar, Steve Padilla, Sasha Pérez, Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Henry Stern, Tony Strickland, Tom Umberg, Aisha Wahab, Akilah Weber Pierson, Scott Wiener
No (7): Steve Choi, Megan Dahle, Brian Jones, Roger Niello, Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, Kelly Seyarto, Suzette Valladares
Other / no vote recorded (5): Marie Alvarado-Gil, Shannon Grove, Eloise Reyes, Laura Richardson, Susan Rubio
Official motion wording
3rd Reading
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
September 13, 2025 — Third reading vote
Passed · 45 yes · 21 no · 14 other
Yes (45): Dawn Addis, Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, Patrick Ahrens, David Alvarez, Joaquin Arambula, Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Steve Bennett, Marc Berman, Tasha Boerner, Mia Bonta, Isaac Bryan, Lisa Calderon, Jessica Caloza, Juan Carrillo, Celeste Rodriguez, Damon Connolly, Sade Elhawary, Mike Fong, Jesse Gabriel, Robert Garcia, Matt Haney, John Harabedian, Gregg Hart, Jacqui Irwin, Corey Jackson, Ash Kalra, Maggy Krell, Alex Lee, Josh Lowenthal, Tina McKinnor, Al Muratsuchi, Liz Ortega, Diane Papan, Darsh Patel, Gail Pellerin, Rhodesia Ransom, Robert Rivas, Chris Rogers, Pilar Schiavo, Nick Schultz, José Solache, Catherine Stefani, Chris Ward, Buffy Wicks, Rick Zbur
No (21): Juan Alanis, Leticia Castillo, Phillip Chen, Laurie Davies, Carl DeMaio, Diane Dixon, Stan Ellis, Heath Flora, James Gallagher, Heather Hadwick, Joshua Hoover, Jeff Gonzalez, Natasha Johnson, Tom Lackey, Ali Macedo, Joe Patterson, Cottie Petrie-Norris, Tri Ta, David Tangipa, Greg Wallis, Anamarie Ávila Farías
Other / no vote recorded (14): Jasmeet Bains, Blanca Rubio, Mike Gipson, Mark González, Michelle Rodriguez, Stephanie Nguyen, Blanca Pacheco, Sharon Quirk-Silva, James Ramos, Kate Sanchez, LaShae Sharp-Collins, Esmeralda Soria, Avelino Valencia, Lori Wilson
Official motion wording
SB 682 Allen Senate Third Reading By Connolly
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
September 13, 2025 — Concurrence vote
Passed · 30 yes · 5 no · 5 other
Yes (30): Ben Allen, Bob Archuleta, Jesse Arreguín, Angelique Ashby, Josh Becker, Catherine Blakespear, Christopher Cabaldon, Anna Caballero, Sabrina Cervantes, Dave Cortese, María Elena Durazo, Tim Grayson, Shannon Grove, Melissa Hurtado, John Laird, Monique Limón, Mike McGuire, Jerry McNerney, Caroline Menjivar, Steve Padilla, Sasha Pérez, Eloise Reyes, Susan Rubio, Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Henry Stern, Tony Strickland, Tom Umberg, Aisha Wahab, Akilah Weber Pierson, Scott Wiener
No (5): Megan Dahle, Brian Jones, Roger Niello, Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, Kelly Seyarto
Other / no vote recorded (5): Marie Alvarado-Gil, Steve Choi, Lena Gonzalez, Laura Richardson, Suzette Valladares
Official motion wording
Unfinished Business SB682 Allen Concurrence
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov