← California State Legislature · All bills
SB 362
Commercial financing: disclosures.
Senate · Other
What this bill does
This bill would prohibit a provider of commercial financing from using the term "interest" or "rate" in a deceptive way that could reasonably result in the recipient being misled and would require those providers to use the term "annual percentage rate" or the acronym "APR" in specified circumstances. The bill would repeal the provision subjecting those providers to the CFL described above and would instead provide that a violation of the disclosure provisions described above and the provisions of the bill is a violation of the CFL if the violation relates to a commercial financing transaction subject to the CFL, or a violation of the California Consumer Financial Protection Law if the violation relates to a commercial financing transaction that is not subject to the CFL. …
Read the full official summary
Existing law requires a provider of commercial financing to disclose certain information, as specified. Existing law provides that a provider of commercial financing licensed under the California Financing Law (CFL) is subject to examination and enforcement by the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation under the CFL for any violation of those disclosure provisions, as specified. Certain violations of the CFL are a crime.
This bill would prohibit a provider of commercial financing from using the term "interest" or "rate" in a deceptive way that could reasonably result in the recipient being misled and would require those providers to use the term "annual percentage rate" or the acronym "APR" in specified circumstances. The bill would repeal the provision subjecting those providers to the CFL described above and would instead provide that a violation of the disclosure provisions described above and the provisions of the bill is a violation of the CFL if the violation relates to a commercial financing transaction subject to the CFL, or a violation of the California Consumer Financial Protection Law if the violation relates to a commercial financing transaction that is not subject to the CFL. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Official summary from the Legislative Counsel’s office, via OpenStates.
Floor votes (3)
June 2, 2025 — Third reading vote
Passed · 38 yes · 0 no · 2 other
Yes (38): Ben Allen, Marie Alvarado-Gil, Bob Archuleta, Jesse Arreguín, Angelique Ashby, Josh Becker, Catherine Blakespear, Christopher Cabaldon, Anna Caballero, Sabrina Cervantes, Steve Choi, Dave Cortese, Megan Dahle, María Elena Durazo, Lena Gonzalez, Tim Grayson, Shannon Grove, Brian Jones, John Laird, Monique Limón, Mike McGuire, Jerry McNerney, Caroline Menjivar, Roger Niello, Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, Steve Padilla, Sasha Pérez, Laura Richardson, Susan Rubio, Kelly Seyarto, Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Henry Stern, Tony Strickland, Tom Umberg, Suzette Valladares, Aisha Wahab, Akilah Weber Pierson, Scott Wiener
Other / no vote recorded (2): Melissa Hurtado, Eloise Reyes
Official motion wording
3rd Reading
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
September 3, 2025 — Third reading vote
Passed · 79 yes · 0 no
Yes (79): Dawn Addis, Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, Patrick Ahrens, Juan Alanis, David Alvarez, Joaquin Arambula, Jasmeet Bains, Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Steve Bennett, Marc Berman, Blanca Rubio, Tasha Boerner, Mia Bonta, Isaac Bryan, Lisa Calderon, Jessica Caloza, Juan Carrillo, Leticia Castillo, Celeste Rodriguez, Phillip Chen, Damon Connolly, Laurie Davies, Carl DeMaio, Diane Dixon, Sade Elhawary, Stan Ellis, Heath Flora, Mike Fong, Jesse Gabriel, James Gallagher, Robert Garcia, Mike Gipson, Heather Hadwick, Matt Haney, John Harabedian, Gregg Hart, Joshua Hoover, Jacqui Irwin, Corey Jackson, Jeff Gonzalez, Ash Kalra, Maggy Krell, Tom Lackey, Alex Lee, Josh Lowenthal, Ali Macedo, Mark González, Tina McKinnor, Michelle Rodriguez, Al Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Liz Ortega, Blanca Pacheco, Diane Papan, Darsh Patel, Joe Patterson, Gail Pellerin, Cottie Petrie-Norris, Sharon Quirk-Silva, James Ramos, Rhodesia Ransom, Robert Rivas, Chris Rogers, Kate Sanchez, Pilar Schiavo, Nick Schultz, LaShae Sharp-Collins, José Solache, Esmeralda Soria, Catherine Stefani, Tri Ta, David Tangipa, Avelino Valencia, Greg Wallis, Chris Ward, Buffy Wicks, Lori Wilson, Rick Zbur, Anamarie Ávila Farías
Official motion wording
SB 362 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
September 8, 2025 — Concurrence vote
Passed · 39 yes · 0 no · 1 other
Yes (39): Ben Allen, Marie Alvarado-Gil, Bob Archuleta, Jesse Arreguín, Angelique Ashby, Josh Becker, Catherine Blakespear, Christopher Cabaldon, Anna Caballero, Sabrina Cervantes, Steve Choi, Dave Cortese, Megan Dahle, María Elena Durazo, Lena Gonzalez, Tim Grayson, Shannon Grove, Melissa Hurtado, Brian Jones, John Laird, Monique Limón, Mike McGuire, Jerry McNerney, Caroline Menjivar, Roger Niello, Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, Steve Padilla, Sasha Pérez, Eloise Reyes, Laura Richardson, Susan Rubio, Kelly Seyarto, Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Tony Strickland, Tom Umberg, Suzette Valladares, Aisha Wahab, Akilah Weber Pierson, Scott Wiener
Other / no vote recorded (1): Henry Stern
Official motion wording
Unfinished Business SB362 Grayson Concurrence
Official record: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov